Assaults on the Bible
Psalm 19:7-14
Introduction
1.
The emphasis of Jesus on Scripture
2.
The emphasis of the apostles on
Scripture
3.
The emphasis in the Reformation on
Scripture
4.
The emphasis in our history on
Scripture
5.
Attacks on the Bible are attacks on
the foundation of our faith
Discussion
1.
“Miracles are impossible because
they contradict science”
a.
The stories concerning Daniel,
Jonah, Elijah and others are rejected as myths
b.
The Exodus “never happened”
c.
Jesus was not raised from the dead
according to these “self proclaimed experts”
2.
“Books have been lost and books
have been added”
a.
Earlier there were contentions that
Moses did not give the law and the apostles did not write the New Testament
b.
Now there are claims that there
were other books rejected because the church did not approve what they said
3.
“The Bible is out of step with
the times”
a.
For these people, they still
believe that the Bible is God’s book, but its “outdated and antiquated
precepts” are no longer applicable to a modern generation – the assumptions
that underlie this view
i.
God could not have anticipated our
times
ii.
Morals change
b.
The roles of men and women, as set
forth in the Bible, are no longer relevant for an “enlightened” society –
the assumptions that underlie this view
i.
The Bible was produced by a
patriarchal society for a patriarchal society
ii.
The Bible represents a view that
says men are superior to women
c.
Homosexuality is simply an
“alternative” life style – the assumptions that underlie this view
i.
People are different and there is
nothing wrong with expressing those differences in the way we act
ii.
The Bible prohibitions do not apply
d.
“Worship needs to reflect the
music of our age” – the assumptions that underlie this view
i.
There were not many choices
available to first century Christians
ii.
iii.
God has no objections to additions
to worship
4.
“The Bible is subject to various
interpretations and all are equally valid”
a.
People often claim, “That is just
your interpretation!”
b.
It is assumed that people cannot
come to a common understanding of what is meant in the Bible, and therefore, one
interpretation is just as good as another – assumption:
everybody is right and nobody is wrong
c.
Every treaty and every contract
assumes that people can come to a common understanding of what is in the
document
Conclusion
1.
The
Bible has withstood the assaults
2.
It is still the book to define
right and wrong
3.
It is still the book to show us
what lies beyond death
4.
It is still the book to show us the
way